#Msi kombustor location Pc#

Since I see them too, with a card running at the reference speeds, and can run more severe tests that get my card into the low 80s with no artifacts, I believe that those lines are in the graphics generated by Kombustor, and are just confusing people.Į.g., one comment about that is someone at:Īnyway, should be under KMark, Physics GPU. If youd like to run the tests on its current settings, move to the next step. In Kombustor 2.5.2, in the KMark (PhysX) tab using the Run X-score (1920x1080) button in the 5th scene, yellowish, with two balls. Thats happened with every card Ive ever owned. This may've been explained somewhere already, but there are posts about this elsewhere on the Internet where people seem to be confused as to whether they are seeing artifacts in Kombustor or not. Since my last card was an 8800gt, things could have changed since then. On many of the overclocking forums, people see those vertical moving lines, and regard them as artifacts. Thanks guys that is what i figured just wanted to make sure. My question is how that test (the PhysX 'combined test') looks on everybody else's system. Location: South Africa Posted JThis is definitely a benchmark that favours ATI, I dont even break 50k on the stock GTX480 on DX10 or DX11, even overclocked at 850mhz, 1700mhz and 2430 (Im not using the MSI Afterburner 1.6.1 that Kombustor comes with because the stupid thing limits me to 2400 mem ) it just breaks 60000 on DX11.

#Msi kombustor location Pc#

The power supply is PC Power & Cooling's Silencer Mk II 650W. During the tests in question, it runs at around 60?. MSI N560GTX-Ti Twin Frozr II Golden Edition, under-clocked 'back' to reference '560 speeds, while I'm working on getting the case to exhaust the heat.